The object I used in my Technical Description was my Gaming computer, although extremely complex, I wanted to write about this because it is the mechanical object that I use everyday and know most about. I built(assembled) this pc myself, so I’m well aware of the general function of each component and how they work with each other. When researching the components, I mainly used sources from companies that I actually own the parts from (I have a NVIDIA GPU, so I used an Nvidia source), since the components do vary from company to company, and that way I can provide a more specific description of my computer.
The main problem was the complexity of my project, but I think I did a good job simplifying my descriptions for a general college audience while adding specificity and more “advanced terminology”. The inclass activities gave me the framework on how I should write my technical description, which was nice, and the peer review was fine, but the questions were pretty broad, which led to pretty vague comments from peers.
I think my technical description gave a very thorough overview of my gaming pc while maintaining clarity for a general audience for which I’m very proud of but if I had to change one thing it might be about my mother board and gpu description where I kind of went a little too overboard with my sources as most of my complex terminology that a general audience would hesitate on was in those 2 paragraphs.
Email us at [email protected] so we can respond to your questions and requests. Please email from your CUNY email address if possible. Or visit our help site for more information:
The object I used in my Technical Description was my Gaming computer, although extremely complex, I wanted to write about this because it is the mechanical object that I use everyday and know most about. I built(assembled) this pc myself, so I’m well aware of the general function of each component and how they work with each other. When researching the components, I mainly used sources from companies that I actually own the parts from (I have a NVIDIA GPU, so I used an Nvidia source), since the components do vary from company to company, and that way I can provide a more specific description of my computer.
The main problem was the complexity of my project, but I think I did a good job simplifying my descriptions for a general college audience while adding specificity and more “advanced terminology”. The inclass activities gave me the framework on how I should write my technical description, which was nice, and the peer review was fine, but the questions were pretty broad, which led to pretty vague comments from peers.
I think my technical description gave a very thorough overview of my gaming pc while maintaining clarity for a general audience for which I’m very proud of but if I had to change one thing it might be about my mother board and gpu description where I kind of went a little too overboard with my sources as most of my complex terminology that a general audience would hesitate on was in those 2 paragraphs.